Quote from: ptgreek on Nov 15, 2009, 01:48:30 AM
That being said, I can honestly say that in my opinion that this is NOT a shooting script.
Doesn't mean the shooting script is necessarily entirely different.
QuoteIt is not written like one and would never have more then a single ending.
Not so. There are precedents for multiple endings being written - the
Scream movies leap to mind - and the shooting script of
Dr. No had suggestions for alternate takes on scenes.
QuoteA shooting script would have been finalized, with camera direction.
Shooting scripts don't always have camera direction. Camera direction in scripts is actually kind'a looked down on - That stuff should be left to the director.
Quoteand would not contain the amount of description that this script has.
Never read a shooting script written by Charlie Kaufman?
![Smiley :)](https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/Smileys/fugue/smiley.png)
QuoteAll of this would have been story boarded by then
Not necessarily. And even if it had, that's no reason to strip back the writing.
QuoteWhile I do believe that this may be an early version, the way it was written, ...there is no way that it would pass a studio exec.
Doesn't have to - It's a commission, not a spec script, and a
revision of a commission at that. There's a lot more formatting freedom in scripts someone's asked you to write, than in scripts you have to pitch and get read.
Quote from: Pinkman on Nov 15, 2009, 02:59:34 AM
ok... Anderson higher than Antal, lol I know who I'm talking to then, it's clear now thanks.
We could argue who's better or worse till the cows come home, but Anderson's a competent director at
least. His movies are let down by horrible scripts - Hand him a decent script and a decent cast (
Event Horizon) and he makes a decent movie.
You can only polish a turd so much - (insert favourite director here) would have a hard time turning Anderson's AvP script, as-is, into anything but a popcorn flick.